Liability

From an ethical standpoint , at that place is no court-ordered disablement to William s statements make watching Suzy . While the facts show that the motivation that he had for reservation such statements had to do with the fact that Suzy has been known to be fumbling and abrasive , on that point is no court-ordered undercoat or recourse for such statements . Ethically , this big businessman be a mistake on the part of William repayable to the fact that he knowingly and willingly misrepresented the skills of Suzy plainly this is only frequent since the law allows unconvincing embellishments such as personal opinions The reckon would be much different if Suzy truly had a unfinished case for disciplinary motivesIf Suzy were indeed leased by some opposite association , Widgets cannot be made liable even if the bas is of the hiring was the glowing recommendation of William .

The reason for this is that the Supreme Court has allowed slight embellishments as to character that ar personal in character because it recognizes the freedom that employees and individuals have with regard to such character judgments . on that point being no other basis but the statements of the supervisor , it cannot be utter that William maliciously , to the detriment and damage of the other company recommended Suzy . It moldiness be pointed out , however , that if in that respect is a log of the absences , this can be used against the company to prove that there was f actual basis for not bad a flourishing rec! ommendationIf , on the other hand , there is a resulting harm or...If you want to get a integral essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper